<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If everybody loves Super Bowl ads, then why don&#039;t advertisers always make Super Bowl-quality ads?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/</link>
	<description>Social media, brand journalism, content marketing, and all things tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wholesale toupee</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4048</link>
		<dc:creator>wholesale toupee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-4048</guid>
		<description>It was really nice to read your post. It was very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was really nice to read your post. It was very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making money from content: Opinions from Intertainment Media. &#187; The future of interstitial advertising in an ever encroaching social media world</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Making money from content: Opinions from Intertainment Media. &#187; The future of interstitial advertising in an ever encroaching social media world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-673</guid>
		<description>[...] advertising in an ever encroaching social media world  I made the argument in a previous article (If everybody loves Super Bowl ads, then why don’t advertisers always make Super Bowl-quality ads? on Spark Minute) that the ads during the Super Bowl should have pointed people to a website or some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advertising in an ever encroaching social media world  I made the argument in a previous article (If everybody loves Super Bowl ads, then why don’t advertisers always make Super Bowl-quality ads? on Spark Minute) that the ads during the Super Bowl should have pointed people to a website or some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Riepe</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Riepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Important to remember: It&#039;s not a link. They can&#039;t click it. It&#039;s a web address that they have to remember.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a lot of brands, saying more means saying less. When you&#039;re brand-building, you&#039;ve got a signal-to-noise ratio to maintain. A web address, to me, is just noise. Coke, Snickers and--surprisingly enough--Google all agree with me. They all ended their ads with brand names and taglines only.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong; I&#039;m a web developer. I&#039;m all for producing microsites and integrating them into campaigns. But you either go all or nothing. Don&#039;t tell your customers to go online if there&#039;s nothing particularly new or related to the campaign there. It&#039;s 2010. They know you have a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important to remember: It&#39;s not a link. They can&#39;t click it. It&#39;s a web address that they have to remember.</p>
<p>For a lot of brands, saying more means saying less. When you&#39;re brand-building, you&#39;ve got a signal-to-noise ratio to maintain. A web address, to me, is just noise. Coke, Snickers and&#8211;surprisingly enough&#8211;Google all agree with me. They all ended their ads with brand names and taglines only.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t get me wrong; I&#39;m a web developer. I&#39;m all for producing microsites and integrating them into campaigns. But you either go all or nothing. Don&#39;t tell your customers to go online if there&#39;s nothing particularly new or related to the campaign there. It&#39;s 2010. They know you have a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Riepe</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Riepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Important to remember: It&#039;s not a link. They can&#039;t click it. It&#039;s a web address that they have to remember.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For a lot of brands, saying more means saying less. When you&#039;re brand-building, you&#039;ve got a signal-to-noise ratio to maintain. A web address, to me, is just noise. Coke, Snickers and--surprisingly enough--Google all agree with me. They all ended their ads with brand names and taglines only.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong; I&#039;m a web developer. I&#039;m all for producing microsites and integrating them into campaigns. But you either go all or nothing. Don&#039;t tell your customers to go online if there&#039;s nothing particularly new or related to the campaign there. It&#039;s 2010. They know you have a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important to remember: It&#39;s not a link. They can&#39;t click it. It&#39;s a web address that they have to remember.</p>
<p>For a lot of brands, saying more means saying less. When you&#39;re brand-building, you&#39;ve got a signal-to-noise ratio to maintain. A web address, to me, is just noise. Coke, Snickers and&#8211;surprisingly enough&#8211;Google all agree with me. They all ended their ads with brand names and taglines only.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t get me wrong; I&#39;m a web developer. I&#39;m all for producing microsites and integrating them into campaigns. But you either go all or nothing. Don&#39;t tell your customers to go online if there&#39;s nothing particularly new or related to the campaign there. It&#39;s 2010. They know you have a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Siegel</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Hi David, &lt;br&gt;Nicely done! I enjoyed your post; both the content and presentation were right on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great writers amaze me. Just found out that Saturday Night Live churns out 45 scripts per episode but only use 15. How does John Stewart manage to be so densely funny night after freakin night?  &lt;br&gt;Thanks to all the funny writers who brighten my days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, <br />Nicely done! I enjoyed your post; both the content and presentation were right on. </p>
<p>Great writers amaze me. Just found out that Saturday Night Live churns out 45 scripts per episode but only use 15. How does John Stewart manage to be so densely funny night after freakin night?  <br />Thanks to all the funny writers who brighten my days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Siegel</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Siegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-774</guid>
		<description>Hi David, &lt;br&gt;Nicely done! I enjoyed your post; both the content and presentation were right on. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great writers amaze me. Just found out that Saturday Night Live churns out 45 scripts per episode but only use 15. How does John Stewart manage to be so densely funny night after freakin night?  &lt;br&gt;Thanks to all the funny writers who brighten my days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, <br />Nicely done! I enjoyed your post; both the content and presentation were right on. </p>
<p>Great writers amaze me. Just found out that Saturday Night Live churns out 45 scripts per episode but only use 15. How does John Stewart manage to be so densely funny night after freakin night?  <br />Thanks to all the funny writers who brighten my days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-776</guid>
		<description>Rex:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since practically every company wants to get into social media, especially the ones that had Super Bowl ads, then why wouldn&#039;t they have a link for more information or better yet a continuation of the story?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To just say &quot;Google It&quot; is putting your company&#039;s future in the indexing engine of another company. Why take chances when you can simply direct your audience to the exact location? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure every business has more to say than what can fit in a 30-second ad. Continuing that message or story on a website seems the best marketing tactic. Why leave your audience hanging? If you&#039;re teasing them with an ad, close the deal with a website that can move your audience closer to sale or better, tell their friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex:</p>
<p>Since practically every company wants to get into social media, especially the ones that had Super Bowl ads, then why wouldn&#39;t they have a link for more information or better yet a continuation of the story?</p>
<p>To just say &#8220;Google It&#8221; is putting your company&#39;s future in the indexing engine of another company. Why take chances when you can simply direct your audience to the exact location? </p>
<p>I&#39;m sure every business has more to say than what can fit in a 30-second ad. Continuing that message or story on a website seems the best marketing tactic. Why leave your audience hanging? If you&#39;re teasing them with an ad, close the deal with a website that can move your audience closer to sale or better, tell their friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Riepe</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Riepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Great points, David.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the most part, I think advertising could benefit from being more Super Bowlesque (although this year&#039;s were disappointing). On the other hand, it&#039;d probably get old fast without the expectations of silliness and party atmosphere that the big game provides.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree on always asking your customers to go online, particularly if there&#039;s nothing worthy there. Dropping 35k on a top-notch online experience is peanuts compared to Super Bowl ad prices. But that can be a significant chunk of normal advertising time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other argument here is search engines: Asking the customer to remember one thing is enough. Let them Google it if they want to know more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, David.</p>
<p>For the most part, I think advertising could benefit from being more Super Bowlesque (although this year&#39;s were disappointing). On the other hand, it&#39;d probably get old fast without the expectations of silliness and party atmosphere that the big game provides.</p>
<p>I disagree on always asking your customers to go online, particularly if there&#39;s nothing worthy there. Dropping 35k on a top-notch online experience is peanuts compared to Super Bowl ad prices. But that can be a significant chunk of normal advertising time.</p>
<p>The other argument here is search engines: Asking the customer to remember one thing is enough. Let them Google it if they want to know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Spark</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>David Spark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Rex:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since practically every company wants to get into social media, especially the ones that had Super Bowl ads, then why wouldn&#039;t they have a link for more information or better yet a continuation of the story?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To just say &quot;Google It&quot; is putting your company&#039;s future in the indexing engine of another company. Why take chances when you can simply direct your audience to the exact location? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure every business has more to say than what can fit in a 30-second ad. Continuing that message or story on a website seems the best marketing tactic. Why leave your audience hanging? If you&#039;re teasing them with an ad, close the deal with a website that can move your audience closer to sale or better, tell their friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex:</p>
<p>Since practically every company wants to get into social media, especially the ones that had Super Bowl ads, then why wouldn&#39;t they have a link for more information or better yet a continuation of the story?</p>
<p>To just say &#8220;Google It&#8221; is putting your company&#39;s future in the indexing engine of another company. Why take chances when you can simply direct your audience to the exact location? </p>
<p>I&#39;m sure every business has more to say than what can fit in a 30-second ad. Continuing that message or story on a website seems the best marketing tactic. Why leave your audience hanging? If you&#39;re teasing them with an ad, close the deal with a website that can move your audience closer to sale or better, tell their friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Riepe</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkminute.com/2010/02/08/if-everybody-loves-super-bowl-ads-then-why-dont-advertisers-always-make-super-bowl-quality-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Riepe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkminute.com/?p=1511#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Great points, David.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the most part, I think advertising could benefit from being more Super Bowlesque (although this year&#039;s were disappointing). On the other hand, it&#039;d probably get old fast without the expectations of silliness and party atmosphere that the big game provides.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree on always asking your customers to go online, particularly if there&#039;s nothing worthy there. Dropping 35k on a top-notch online experience is peanuts compared to Super Bowl ad prices. But that can be a significant chunk of normal advertising time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other argument here is search engines: Asking the customer to remember one thing is enough. Let them Google it if they want to know more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, David.</p>
<p>For the most part, I think advertising could benefit from being more Super Bowlesque (although this year&#39;s were disappointing). On the other hand, it&#39;d probably get old fast without the expectations of silliness and party atmosphere that the big game provides.</p>
<p>I disagree on always asking your customers to go online, particularly if there&#39;s nothing worthy there. Dropping 35k on a top-notch online experience is peanuts compared to Super Bowl ad prices. But that can be a significant chunk of normal advertising time.</p>
<p>The other argument here is search engines: Asking the customer to remember one thing is enough. Let them Google it if they want to know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

